UK time is: 21:21:37
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Were We Too Harsh…NO!



Lucas Neill was unhappy with the reception he received from the Ewood Park crowd when he returned to Blackburn recently with his West Ham United side.

When asked if you thought we were too harsh the vast majority, in one form of another (75% in total) say NO! 18% wondered what he was expecting whilst the other 57% merely felt he deserved it. 24% thought that maybe we were a little unfair on a former favourite with the final 1% undecided.

So in summary
Yes, a touch harsh - 24%
No, what did he expect - 18%
No, he deserved it - 57%
Maybe - 1%


Recently we asked who you thought had been Mark Hughes best signing, most agreed on one man but for those that didn't comment here it is on poll format so the current poll is asking, Who has been Sparky's best signing so far?

As for what you think, cast your vote and why not have your say on the latest polls findings…


Do you have an idea for a poll? To submit it click here

Why should you sign up to Vital Blackburn? - Click Here
The Journalist

Writer: Walker Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Sunday March 25 2007

Time: 12:41AM

Your Comments

I don't know what Lucas was expecting but he got what I thought he would, maybe a little too much but I'm sure he'll get over it... with his money :)
Hughes Da Man
Even though I like Emerton, I think Neill was better as a defender. On the other hand, Emerton adds a new dimension in attack and I think it's much more important..... I think he didnt deserve that kind of attitdue, since each and every one of us (?) would have prefered a lucrative 4 times bigger contract.
IsraeliRover
Maybe we would all want extra money and you can accept this, as would we, it was just the talk he gave on his reasons for leaving don't correspond with a move to the Hammered do they really?!?!
Hughes Da Man
As i said in another article, Neill is a better defender than Emerton, no question about it, the difference is Emerton will get better and he WANTS to play for Rovers, makes the world of difference in my book. Neill got what he expected after the lies that were told over his big money move. Hughes Da Man ur rite, everyone wants more money, so why not just say it, why the cover up about moving for footballing reasons?? when clearly this was not the case
Clint
You have far more respect for people if they come out and be honest. Maybe his claimed motives were his motives to begin with but when push came to shove he knew he wouldn't play much for Liverpool (or a team similar as he isn't good enough for a regular place it's that simple) so if he'd even then said as much and admitted the extra money on the table from the Hammered helped soften the blow from not getting his "dream move" we could accept it more.
Hughes Da Man
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. dallydally 2

League Results (view all)

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
8. Middlesbrough 10 5 2 3 6 17
9. Sheff Wed 10 4 4 2 3 16
10. Reading 9 4 2 3 0 14
11. Blackburn 10 4 2 4 -2 14
12. Brentford 10 4 2 4 -3 14
13. Cardiff 10 3 4 3 0 13
14. Leeds Utd 9 4 1 4 -2 13

Breaking League News

Connelly Signs Contract Extension
» Cardiff : 01/10/2014 20:03:00
Fulham v Bolton - Team Sheets
» Fulham : 01/10/2014 19:42:00
Zola Is The Bookies Favourite!
» Fulham : 01/10/2014 19:06:00
LUFC BREAKING: Leeds United v Reading Teamsheet
» Leeds Utd : 01/10/2014 18:45:00
Watford Scrape Win Against Brentford
» Brentford : 01/10/2014 18:27:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Blackburn Rovers Man of the Match v Rotherham United
Suggested By:  Walker
Steele 0%
Marshall 0%
Hanley 0%
Duffy 0%
Olsson 100%
Taylor (off 76) 0%
Tunnicliffe 0%
Evans 0%
Conway (off 45) 0%
Rhodes 0%
Gestede (off 32) 0%
Substitute: Varney (on 32) 0%
Substitute: King (on 45) 0%
Substitute: Henley (on 76) 0%