Date:Monday August 20 2007
Why did Arsenal Manager Arsene Wenger feel the need to attack Blackburn Rovers after the 1-1 draw at Ewood Park on Sunday afternoon? Was it justified, or just him moaning like he does? Help me out guys!!!
I write this without the benefit of having seen the match on Sunday afternoon, work commitments have ensured that the only view or opinion I have on the events of Sunday afternoon at Ewood Park are those which I see in print, and the VERY limited highlights that I have seen.
After the game Wenger felt the need to attack Rovers, when he branded them violent. He told the BBC: "I felt there was a desire for violence more than commitment in their challenges.
"We dealt well with the problem we had against a team that was over-physical."
Again, as I say I find it very difficult to comment on the subject as I have not seen ANYWHERE NEAR enough to know what exactly happened, but from what I can make out it was nothing more than a competitive match in which Rovers gave as good as they got, with it actually being Robin Van Persie who produced the games worse challenge (which only saw him see yellow, when it maybe should have been red?!?!)
Mark Hughes felt that Rovers had the better of the game, which he felt was competitive, nothing more nothing less and Wenger's comments disappointed him, he responded (again to the BBC) with: "That attitude by Wenger surprises me.
"The worst challenge was by Van Persie on Stephen Warnock.
"It was very competitive and I thought we dominated the game. We were the better side. We showed great character and equipped ourselves well against a top side."
Rovers have had a reputation in the past (and I will hold my hands up and say a couple of years back RIGHTLY so) but just when you think they are betting past this along comes something like this, WHY the need for it Wenger??? EVERYONE knows that as soon as the worlds violence are mentioned in the same sentence as Rovers the VAST MAJORITY will take this as being the truth without any evidence needed.
I CAN'T stress enough that without the benefit of seeing ANY of this myself I don't know what to think, but I tend (naturally) to be swayed towards siding with the Rovers view on this (as you would expect) but from what I hear and see it would appear that this would not be a blinkered approach to do so. Wenger often sees what he wants to see and nothing more, was the fact that Rovers would not allow Arsenal to play (how dare they!!!) the thing that annoyed him? I honestly don`t know, I hope more of you can shed some light on this for me……
NOT REGISTERED TO VITAL BLACKBURN? WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR! Register by clicking here.
Don't forget "Walkerbout" Sunday Evenings in the forum between 7pm & 9pm - For more information click here.
Date:Monday August 20 2007
Rovers Look At Cuellar And Spence (Wednesday July 30 2014)
The Rovers Number One (Wednesday July 30 2014)
Maybe Rochina Might Stay?? (Tuesday July 29 2014)
Rudy Absence In The Balance (Tuesday July 29 2014)
Enquires But Nothing Concrete For Best (Wednesday July 23 2014)
Rovers In Need Of A Right-Back (Tuesday July 22 2014)
Rovers Keane On Michael Again (Saturday July 19 2014)
Strengthen The Defence (Wednesday July 16 2014)
Best If Leon And Rovers Part (Wednesday July 16 2014)
Marrow leaves Rovers (Tuesday July 15 2014)
|10.||Rye of the Rovers||4|
|Owls edged out by Magpies in friendly
» Sheff Wed : 30/07/2014 23:53:00
|LUFC Dawson hat-trick in Leeds win
» Leeds Utd : 30/07/2014 21:37:00
|LUFC Lees set to complete Owls move
» Leeds Utd : 30/07/2014 20:48:00
|LUFC Leeds end interest in defender
» Leeds Utd : 30/07/2014 19:57:00
|Blog: StAn's Fans 3-/07/14
» Birmingham : 30/07/2014 19:09:00