Date:Friday August 3 2007
I'm sure I'm not the only one who's been ravenously devouring pre-season reviews online, scoffing at any lowly pundit who predicts anything but Premiership glory for the Rovers come May.
But something troubling has caught my eye over the last week: it's a consistent theme in these reviews to characterise the Rovers as a dirty team. Chief culprit: Football365.
Phillip Cornwall, who wrote the Blackburn Preview for Football365 said (just a few things) this on that Website:
"A couple of years ago it was very much a case of 'J'accuse Mark'ughes' in this piece, after the God-awful display in the FA Cup semi-final against Arsenal set the seal on Blackburn's reputation as the dirtiest and one of the dullest teams in the top flight.
Rovers fans were unhappy. Hughes was obviously completely unaware of my criticism, but he reacted strongly to the universal verdict of the national press on the negativity of his side.
Has much changed? Hughes has spent much of the time since claiming a )we're not as dirty as we used to be, but b) we're were not as dirty as you claimed, not dirty at all in fact, stop being mean.
Rovers fans have voiced similar views. Reader James Greenwood was objecting to the notion that 'Blackburn will be able to kick their way out of trouble' in Mailbox on Tuesday. Though he issued what observers of the late President Nixon would consider a non-denial denial: he emphasised the calibre of football played at Ewood, rather than addressing the issue of whether Blackburn try to kick their way out of trouble.
The facts are that in the Premiership only Bolton picked up more bookings than Blackburn last season and the two clubs were tied for total cards thanks to the latter's 7-4 lead in reds. Fans have suggested this is a case of referees acting on reputation, of 'give a dog a bad name'. In this case, Rover. But few outsiders are convinced."
Obviously we'd all spend as much time as we can watching the lads in action and as far as I can see we're no worse, but probably no better than any other team in the league. Still, we finished bottom of the fair play league last season and some would say the figures don't lie.
Is our reputation still suffering from the impact of Andy Todd's elbow on Robin Van Persie's face? Or.... is there a bit of a rough streak we'd rather not admit to?
NOT REGISTERED TO VITAL BLACKBURN? WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR! Register by clicking here.
Don't forget "Walkerbout" Sunday Evenings in the forum between 7pm & 9pm - For more information click here.
Date:Friday August 3 2007
Rovers Bring In Ipswich's Taylor (Friday March 27 2015)
Rhodes Returns For Scotland (Friday March 27 2015)
Striker Stays With Ipswich (Thursday March 26 2015)
No Blackett Interest & Rhodes Not For Sale! (Thursday March 26 2015)
Bolton Plan Loanee Talks (Thursday March 26 2015)
Blackburn Keen On Defender Return (Tuesday March 24 2015)
On Is Off Again! (Monday March 23 2015)
Winger Returns To Blackburn (Monday March 23 2015)
Rhodes Or Gestede?? (Monday March 23 2015)
Bowyer: Standard We Have Set Was Not Met (Monday March 23 2015)
|12. Sheff Wed||39||13||14||12||-4||53|
|13. Leeds Utd||39||14||10||15||-4||52|
|Brentford Rest And Rotate
» Brentford : 28/03/2015 09:56:01
|RUFC - Technology Or Not For Refs?
» Rotherham : 28/03/2015 09:16:00
|LUFC Byram aiming for promotion push next season
» Leeds Utd : 28/03/2015 09:00:01
|LUFC Young midfielder looking ahead to next season
» Leeds Utd : 28/03/2015 08:00:01
|Commons: We Haven't Replaced Hooper
» Norwich : 28/03/2015 07:00:01