Blackburn Rovers - Blackburn Rovers Contracts
UK time is: 12:58:17
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Blackburn Rovers Contracts

Having praised the transfer team, I now wonder if there is room for improvement in just one section, transfer contracts.

From recent press reports of many of the big names moving this summer, previous clubs have received a sell on fee, typically 25%. Did we receive any cash from Liverpool for Bellamy's move? Even if it was only on the 1.5m profit Liverpool made.

Anyone know of clauses in other contracts? (e.g. Lucas Neill's contract if he moves from West Ham?). They probably won't become known until transfers happen but I would have thought any Bellamy fee would have been published, or perhaps I missed that news.


NOT REGISTERED TO VITAL BLACKBURN? WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR! Register by clicking here.




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Please help Vital Football by spending 3 minutes on our survey: The 3 minutes Vital Survey

The Journalist

Writer: r.waterfall Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Friday July 20 2007

Time: 12:48PM

Your Comments (oldest first)

Change to most recent first
That is another good point r.waterfall.
All too often we hear about players having clauses in their Rovers deals (Bellamy for example), but we don't seem to hear of Rovers putting any in contracts when players are sold!!! Surely the deal that saw Bellers leave should have included a sell on clause?!?! Maybe it did of sorts, and Rovers might have got first option on taking him back before he went to the Hammered?!?!
Hughes Da Man
Report Abuse
20/07/2007 12:51:00

Sell on deals are usually when a club has a player from the youth academy or from an early start of their career... I suspect that when we signed Bellamy he was able to demand more terms but when he went to Liverpool there would have been less scope for that. I doubt very much that we were able to demand any terms to Liverpool as we didn't really have a lot of choice.
Ex Ewood Resident
Report Abuse
20/07/2007 12:54:00

Yeah good point but i doubt it and if we did and the club gained some money why would they make it public, sounds like the takeover won't be done until after the transfer window which is a big shame, but im sure Rovers will have a better start to the season, with the intertoto cup games.
roverjoy
Report Abuse
20/07/2007 15:31:00

It is a BIG shame the takeover won't happen before the window shuts, but how much difference will it really make now?!?! I don't think the principles of the club will change at all even with some money, so it's a shame but not a MASSIVE shame.
Hughes Da Man
Report Abuse
20/07/2007 23:43:00

We will soldier on... we dont need the money. We have a great squad and as long as we retain the players we have and make smart additions then we will be on a roll.
MikeyGamst
Report Abuse
21/07/2007 10:04:00

The worry though is the longer we go without money, the harder it will be to keep up (despite the gems unearth time and again) and if we can't keep up players leave.
Hughes Da Man
Report Abuse
22/07/2007 01:21:00

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Blackburn Rovers Articles

Davies A Rovers Option?? (Tuesday June 30 2015)

Three Rovers Changes (Tuesday June 30 2015)

Morris Leaving Ewood Park (Tuesday June 30 2015)

Rovers Linked With Maynard (Tuesday June 30 2015)

More Interest? (Saturday June 27 2015)

Norwich Interest In Striker (Saturday June 27 2015)

Midfielder Departs For Fulham (Saturday June 27 2015)

Testing And Frustrating (Saturday June 27 2015)

Archived Blackburn Rovers Articles

List All Vital Blackburn Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

League Results (view all)

Latest Results

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
1. Birmingham 0 0 0 0 +0 0
2. Blackburn 0 0 0 0 +0 0
3. Bolton 0 0 0 0 +0 0
4. Brentford 0 0 0 0 +0 0
5. Brighton 0 0 0 0 +0 0
6. Bristol City 0 0 0 0 +0 0
7. Burnley 0 0 0 0 +0 0

Breaking League News

LUFC Leeds giving trial to Man City youngster
Leeds Utd : 01/07/2015 11:38:00
Fulham Lose Out on Striker Target
Fulham : 01/07/2015 10:40:00
LUFC Leeds complete Wood signing
Leeds Utd : 01/07/2015 10:17:00
The Chase for Donaldson
Birmingham : 01/07/2015 10:15:01
Clement Happy With Goalkeeping Competition
Derby County : 01/07/2015 10:00:01

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

10m for Rhodes....Fair price?
Suggested By:  VitalRovers
Yes! Easily worth 10m 17%
No....It's not enough! 68%
Too much 12%
Whatever we'll not get that 2%