Vital Football

Latest Blackburn Rovers News

Hammers Disrupting Both End?

Hammers Disrupting Both End?

Clint shares his views on the Javier Mascherano and Carlos Tevez debate involving West Ham United and their fine as opposed to points deduction. As he points out it's not ALL about the relegation threatened sides!

All the talk of the Hammers has been centred around the likes of Charlton, Sheff Utd and Wigan but what about other clubs like ours??

A little while back we were beaten in a game that we should never have been beaten in at home to the Hammers, and not only was Tevez offside and the ball never crossed the line! But now it seems that the player himself was ineligible for the game even. Now am I the only one that considers this to be as much an injustice as the bottom 5-6 clubs have said there fight with the Hammers seems to be?

Yes they are talking about being relegated from the league when the TV money has gone up and this is lot of money, money which Rovers will receive I know, and I feel for these clubs that should not have put in this position as I believe that West Ham should be deducted points for breaking the rules, which they surely knew they were doing. There is an argument for past regimes and stuff but the club itself should be punished.

But for the point I'm making about MY team - Rovers, it seems a kick in the spools for our run towards a 2nd season in UFEA Cup and the extra money that this brings. While we are a smaller club in the league who have done really well with bargain buys and such when you get the opportunity to test your team against some of the best in Europe whilst making some extra cash then you have to take it.

The West Ham defeat, which was never a defeat at the time now takes on a new level, as Blackburn certainly lost 1pt and quite possibly all 3pts then this would have given us some more room in the tight run in for Top 7 and I certainly believe that should the other clubs, who have a case against the punishment handed out, then I think so do Rovers and maybe other teams that West Ham have taken points off this season whilst playing Tevez and Mascherano.

Maybe I'm wrong but.....................

THIS ARTICLE WAS WRITTEN AND SUBMITTED BY CLINT.


NOT REGISTERD TO VITAL BLACKBURN? WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR! Register by clicking here.

Win FREE pizza with Vital Football!
Select your team and get 50% off if they score twice.
www.papajohns.co.uk/football



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:Walker
Date:Tuesday May 8 2007
Time: 12:45PM

Comments

0
I think Clint makes a VERY fair point, and I'm not just seeing this with a Rovers biased opinion. Had Tevez NOT have played in that match he wouldn't have won the penalty, wouldn't have scored the penalty and wouldn't have been as influential for the Hammered in their comeback (including the goal that NEVER was!) The Hammered were given a "record" £5.5 million fine but is this any consolation to the teams that will go down, is this a consolation to Rovers should this mean we miss out on the riches Europe will bring? WILL this bring back players clubs may lose as a result?!?! NO!!! That will be pocket change to the Hammered if they stay up. What about what happened to Middlesbrough? They broke rules and HAD 3 points taken away, this cost them relegation. Different rules were broken, but they were broken nevertheless so WHY weren't the Hammered docked points? If there is ANY justice the Hammered WILL go down anyway, but it looks like they will escape, if so the inquest will continue and why shouldn't we feel aggrieved also!
Hughes Da Man
08/05/2007 12:48:00
0
Whatever your point, the punishment has been decided. You can not expect the premier league or fa to go and revise the punishment. Furthermore it was an independent committee, so the fa will stand behind that. I agree there was an injustice in the goal you refer to but football is like that. All teams can point to incidents where they are rightly aggrieved so pointing to an individual incident is not going to win any arguments. Get over it
xorsch
08/05/2007 13:15:00
0
per daily mail The Premier League, under fire on various fronts, have no fear of the legal action launched against them by disaffected relegation rivals over West Ham escaping a points deduction. This is partly because the clubs have rubberstamped the disciplinary system themselves. The Premiership send a list to all 20 clubs asking for their approval of the names being put forward to form the independent tribunals who judge on serious cases like West Ham's admitted guilt over rule breaches in the registration of Carlos Tevez and Javier Mascherano. The trio on the panel are generally made up of a legal expert, a high-ranking public figure and someone with great knowledge of football but totally independent of the Premier League. So the three who gave West Ham their £5.5million fine were Simon Bourne-Arton, a QC, Lord Ouseley, chairman of the Kick It Out antiracism campaign, and David Dent, former secretary of the Football League. None of the clubs now protesting made objections to the West Ham tribunal when they had the chance, or to any of the other Premiership tribunal figures, making it difficult to see how they can mount a successful legal action.
xorsch
08/05/2007 13:16:00
0
im not saying that Balckburn should complain to the FA but I think that there are too many clubs that are affected by wot basically a balent cop-out by the FA. West Ham have broken the rules of the game as laid out by them and should be punished, sure £5.5m wouldnt even have bought Tevez outrite at the time so they have got off cheap, I read somewhere that the FA took into affect the clubs fans, why just one clubs set of fans then?? Wot about the others affected through the season, Wot of Wigan and its fans, who unfortunatley have dropped into the btm3, as a result of losses of course but if West Ham had of been deducted points then, would they be there?? I dont think so. When u look at there possibility of losing up to £30m the the Hammers ' may as well not been fined ' £5.5m who's fans are set to lose the most???
Clint
08/05/2007 13:16:00
0
Breaches of rules SHOULD hurt clubs (if this hurts fans it's the way it HAS to be!) where it hurts the most, their wallets, which a £5.5 million fine did, but POINTS deduction would have hurt this wallet even more as they would be down already. Were Middlesbrough fans taken into account when they were deducted points for not playing a match?!?! I hope the Hammered go down as they deserve to go down after breaching rules however they are set out, but they probably won't now. The FA, this independent panel, the Hammered should ALL be taken for as much as teams affected by this ruling can get, but then sadly this will probably affect football even more as these powers will look to recover this amount.
Hughes Da Man
08/05/2007 13:25:00
0
It's just a shame that with their win over Wigan at the weekend justice will not be done. Let's all pray that the Manc's put on a party show against the hammered and that Wigan beat whoever they are playing and that Sheff Utd get the points they need - it's a long shot, but would make me happy. Let's not forget Lucas in this...
Wellsy
08/05/2007 13:27:00
0
The WHOLE of the league should have been effected by it as both Tevez and Mascherano should NEVER have played for West Ham. The fact that the FA have re-drawn a contract that allows Tevez to continue playing is the biggest con though. Why the hell are West Ham able to re-sign a player when the transfer window is closed??? The whole situation stinks of corruption!!!
Blade1889
08/05/2007 13:28:00
0
I feel that this record fine is a cop-out from the FA, they stated that they were taking into the West Ham fans but wot about the other teams fans that have been affected. Teams like Rovers and others have lost points to a team who broke the rules, im sure they're are more but none I can think of that have been affected like Rovers have been by West Ham and Tevez in particular, I feel for those in Wigan who have slipped into the btm3, this has been due to bad results and in a fair world then yeah they deserve to be there, but if West Ham been deducted points for a balent breach of the rules, then Wigan would not be looking to lose £30m or wot ever the new TV money will bring each club. If of course West Ham stay up then they make 6 times more than this record fine imposed. £5.5m would not even been enough to buy Tevez so to say they got off lightly is an understatement. I sure Boro will be having a look at this to as they lost out on money as well then after a points reduction relegated them, could they have a case against the FA?
Clint
08/05/2007 13:29:00
0
Problem is Wellsy Wigan play Sheffield United! For the Hammered to go down Wigan would have to beat the blades and Manure thump the Hammered, which I'm not so sure of, with the FA Cup Final approaching what sort of team will they play, how much will they feel they need to put on a show?!?! Feel we could see a game similar to that in a World Cup in the 70's I think it was (maybe Germany vs. Austria) played at a pedestrian pace were a draw was enough for both, so they took it! I'd LOVE to see Manure win (god, can't often say that!) and win big to see Lucas and his Hammered go down.
Hughes Da Man
08/05/2007 13:37:00
0
I'm surprised Middlesbrough haven't already had something to say. Money is making too much go on that SHOULDN'T be going on.
Hughes Da Man
08/05/2007 13:40:00
Page 1/3
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

Login to post a comment

Recent Blackburn Rovers Articles

Match Day Officials v Reading (7/5/16)

The Football League have now announced the Match Day officials that will take charge of the game against Reading this weekend.

Kilgallon Talks Lambert Exit Disappointment

Ahead of the Rotherham win it was revealed Lambert was leaving the club with Kilgallon saying how 'gutted' he and the rest of the Blackburn squad were at this news.

Former Bradford And Wigan Boss Linked

Jewell's been out of work since a week-long stint with West Brom, before this the former Bradford and Wigan boss was last the outright boss at Ipswich, who sacked him in 2012.

Lambert Says Blackburn Need Help

Continued uncertainty surrounding the club and our financial future saw Lambert decide to activate a 'release clause' allowing him to walk away from Blackburn at the end of the season.

Archived Vital Blackburn Articles

Vital Blackburn articles from

Site Journalists

Walker
Editor email
Profile
VitalRovers
no email
Profile
Mikey Delap
no email
Profile
Sasman!
no email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

Rotherham MotM
Suggested By: Site Staff
Steele10%
Lowe0%
Duffy9%
Hanley9%
Kilgallon0%
Marshall0%
Lenihan54%
Jordi Gomez0%
Grimes0%
Bennett0%
Graham18%
Sub - Jackson0%
Sub - Evans0%
Sub - Conway0%
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
1 Burnley 45 25 15 5 90 34
2 Middlesbrough 45 26 10 9 88 32
3 Brighton 45 24 16 5 88 30
4 Hull City 45 23 11 11 80 30
5 Derby County 45 21 15 9 78 24
6 Sheff Wed 45 19 17 9 74 22
7 Cardiff 45 17 16 12 67 5
8 Ipswich 45 17 15 13 66 1
9 Birmingham 45 16 14 15 62 4
10 Brentford 45 18 8 19 62 1
11 Preston 45 15 16 14 61 0
12 Leeds Utd 45 14 16 15 58 -8
13 Q.P.R. 45 13 18 14 57 -1
14 Wolves 45 13 16 16 55 -6
15 Blackburn 45 12 16 17 52 -2
16 Reading 45 13 13 19 52 -5
17 Forest 45 12 16 17 52 -5
18 Bristol City 45 13 13 19 52 -16
19 Huddersfield 45 13 12 20 51 -7
20 Rotherham 45 13 10 22 49 -14
21 Fulham 45 11 15 19 48 -14
R Charlton 45 9 13 23 40 -37
R MK Dons 45 9 12 24 39 -29
R Bolton 45 5 15 25 30 -39
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News

Recent Blackburn Rovers Results (view all)

Blackburn Rovers Fixtures (view all)

May 7 2016 12:30PM : Reading (H)
Sky Bet Championship