UK time is: 01:15:17
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Rhodes Given 10m Price Tag

Speculation has come out today that Norwich City have offered 8million for Jordan Rhodes, however, this was turned down by Blackburn Rovers.

In response reports say that Rhodes has had a 10million prices tag "slapped on his head", I do hope it wasn't in permanent marker!!

It does seem as though these reports (which thoughts in the forum say originated from The Daily Mirror) aren't exactly new though and this Norwich (a bitter rival of a former club Ipswich Town) approach was before they signed one (or both) of the strikers that they have this summer so I think we can rest a little easier and Huddersfield Town can stop thinking (I hope) that they'll be getting a twenty percent cut of any transfer fee.

Rhodes has a good few years left on his contract at Ewood Park so as much as player power often gets a move I don't think we've got to worry too much about being forced into a sale anytime soon and even then I'm not sure that 10million would be enough anyway, it shouldn't be and if he's going to move he'll at least join a Premier League club, which we could quite conceivable be at the end of the 2014-2015 season anyway!!

What was a little concerning though (if there was any truth to it) was that the Scottish International has asked for a pay rise after this offer was rejected?? This is either mischief making in the tabloids or the striker (or his agent) is looking to force our hand or profit from speculated interest.

Join The Vital Debate




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Walker Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Monday July 7 2014

Time: 6:48PM

Your Comments (oldest first)

Change to most recent first
10M would be ridiculous. If he was worth 8M when he came his stock has risen considerably since. I'd say 13 - 15M or tell them where to go
dallydally
Report Abuse
07/07/2014 21:47:00

I don't think there's much in this. Agree though that if he was sold would be nearer 15m or noway a deal!!
walker
Report Abuse
07/07/2014 22:29:00

Def think we have much more than 10 on his head! Don't want to lose him as he and Rudy are building something special!
Sasman!
Report Abuse
07/07/2014 23:28:00

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Blackburn Rovers Articles

Rovers Bring In Ipswich's Taylor (Friday March 27 2015)

Rhodes Returns For Scotland (Friday March 27 2015)

Striker Stays With Ipswich (Thursday March 26 2015)

Bolton Plan Loanee Talks (Thursday March 26 2015)

Blackburn Keen On Defender Return (Tuesday March 24 2015)

On Is Off Again! (Monday March 23 2015)

Winger Returns To Blackburn (Monday March 23 2015)

Rhodes Or Gestede?? (Monday March 23 2015)

Archived Blackburn Rovers Articles

List All Vital Blackburn Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

Vital Members League (view all)

1. Walker 111
2. dallydally 36
3. rover50 19
4. rovers2011 8
5. Rye of the Rovers 4
6. roverjoy 3

League Results (view all)

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
7. Brentford 39 20 6 13 12 66
8. Wolves 39 18 11 10 11 65
9. Forest 39 15 12 12 8 57
10. Blackburn 39 14 12 13 1 54
11. Charlton 39 13 15 11 -2 54
12. Sheff Wed 39 13 14 12 -4 53
13. Leeds Utd 39 14 10 15 -4 52

Breaking League News

LUFC Leeds amongst the form teams in February
Leeds Utd : 30/03/2015 20:43:00
Meet The Ref - Boro v Latics - Stuart Attwell
Wigan : 30/03/2015 19:57:01
Write For Vital Bolton
Bolton : 30/03/2015 19:41:01
The Price Of Prising McClaren Away
Derby County : 30/03/2015 18:29:00
Royals hit with Football League fine
Reading : 30/03/2015 18:23:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Brighton MotM
Suggested By:  VitalRovers
Steele 11%
Henley 8%
Baptiste 8%
Kilgallon 0%
Olsson 41%
Taylor 0%
Spearing 8%
Cairney 0%
Marshall 0%
Brown 0%
Rhodes 16%
Sub:-Spurr 0%
Sub:-Gestede 8%