UK time is: 21:06:23
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Rhodes Given 10m Price Tag

Speculation has come out today that Norwich City have offered 8million for Jordan Rhodes, however, this was turned down by Blackburn Rovers.

In response reports say that Rhodes has had a 10million prices tag "slapped on his head", I do hope it wasn't in permanent marker!!

It does seem as though these reports (which thoughts in the forum say originated from The Daily Mirror) aren't exactly new though and this Norwich (a bitter rival of a former club Ipswich Town) approach was before they signed one (or both) of the strikers that they have this summer so I think we can rest a little easier and Huddersfield Town can stop thinking (I hope) that they'll be getting a twenty percent cut of any transfer fee.

Rhodes has a good few years left on his contract at Ewood Park so as much as player power often gets a move I don't think we've got to worry too much about being forced into a sale anytime soon and even then I'm not sure that 10million would be enough anyway, it shouldn't be and if he's going to move he'll at least join a Premier League club, which we could quite conceivable be at the end of the 2014-2015 season anyway!!

What was a little concerning though (if there was any truth to it) was that the Scottish International has asked for a pay rise after this offer was rejected?? This is either mischief making in the tabloids or the striker (or his agent) is looking to force our hand or profit from speculated interest.

Join The Vital Debate




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Walker Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Monday July 7 2014

Time: 6:48PM

Your Comments (oldest first)

Change to most recent first
10M would be ridiculous. If he was worth 8M when he came his stock has risen considerably since. I'd say 13 - 15M or tell them where to go
dallydally
Report Abuse
07/07/2014 21:47:00

I don't think there's much in this. Agree though that if he was sold would be nearer 15m or noway a deal!!
walker
Report Abuse
07/07/2014 22:29:00

Def think we have much more than 10 on his head! Don't want to lose him as he and Rudy are building something special!
Sasman!
Report Abuse
07/07/2014 23:28:00

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Blackburn Rovers Articles

Stats: Blackburn v Fulham (Saturday January 31 2015)

Rovers Preview: Fulham (H) (Saturday January 31 2015)

Rovers Secure Spearing (Saturday January 31 2015)

Stick or twist (Friday January 30 2015)

Team News: Blackburn v Fulham (Friday January 30 2015)

Rovers Revival Must Start Saturday! (Friday January 30 2015)

Bowyer Finally Gets Spearing?? (Friday January 30 2015)

Blackburn MotM Against Derby (Friday January 30 2015)

An Odd Decision!! (Thursday January 29 2015)

Archived Blackburn Rovers Articles

List All Vital Blackburn Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. dallydally 49
2. Walker 20
3. roverjoy 19
4. Rye of the Rovers 17
5. rover50 14
6. rovers2011 12
7. marshinrover 3
8. Tombo1984 2
9. ptholt 2
10. cboyer 2

League Results (view all)

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
6. Watford 28 14 5 9 23 47
7. Wolves 28 12 9 7 -2 45
8. Norwich 28 12 8 8 16 44
9. Blackburn 28 10 9 9 0 39
10. Sheff Wed 28 9 11 8 -4 38
11. Birmingham 28 9 10 9 -8 37
12. Forest 28 8 10 10 -3 34

Breaking League News

Boro sting Bees
Middlesbrough : 31/01/2015 20:53:00
Birmingham 0 - 0 Norwich
Norwich : 31/01/2015 20:14:00
Fulham : 31/01/2015 19:55:00
Another City GroundHOG Day!
Forest : 31/01/2015 18:34:00
Reading 2 - 0 Sheffield Wednesday
Reading : 31/01/2015 18:28:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Fulham MotM
Suggested By:  
Steele 0%
Lowe 0%
Hanley 0%
Kilgallon 0%
Olsson 0%
Marshall 0%
Evans 100%
Spearing 0%
Conway 0%
Rhodes 0%
Brown 0%
Sub:-Taylor 0%
Sub:-Cairney 0%