UK time is: 08:11:53
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Rovers shoot themselves in the foot again

Phil Jones has a 'release clause` in his Blackburn Rovers contract that would allow him to leave the club if any of the clubs circling him bid 16million.

Masterful contract negotiation has left Rovers with their hands tied in their attempts to keep Jones who is known to be an ambitious guy and would probably see a move to one of England's leading lights as too good a chance to turn down.

There has even been a rumour that Jones met briefly with Steve Kean yesterday and informed him that he would like the chance to talk to other clubs if bids are received and accepted.

So in short, not good.

Bigwigs at Rovers are still hopeful that Jonesy will stay at the club for at least another season but the facts and the gossip seem to indicate that sounds like a losing battle.

Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal, Man City and Man United are all ready to rock and roll.

With those clubs chasing him we could have had the auctions to end all auctions. But due to clauses that we inserted in the contracts of Damien Duff and Craig Bellamy in the past it looks as if our hands are tied.

Join The Vital Debate




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Mikey Delap Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Tuesday June 7 2011

Time: 9:03AM

Your Comments

Not a great evening/morning to wake up to!
Mikey Delap
who had the clever idea to put a clause in his contract?! can't believe it, incredibly poor management
LHrover
With all the uncertainty around the club he was probably advised to insist on such a clause. Just because it is there doesnt mean it has to be activated, and 16m is still a starting point.
Darwenbill
I agree with DARWENBELL on this, you have to see it in Footballing terms. When PJ agreed on a new deal there was the uncertainty around the club and no doubt his agent was making sure he had options. The main thing is if we're his club so he probably won't want to leave just yet unless we get such a big offer that the club can't refuse like with Andy Carroll in January.
ITSALLROVER
What do you expect with the clowns now running our club, and one of the muppets as manager? Nothing has changed we still have to sell our best players to fund any transfer dealings. If you were Phil Jones would you stay?
Rover_since74
Shooting ourselves in the foot or Masterstroke?, The figure is there for all to see, and its case of pay it, or the boy stays. If the shoe was on the other foot and we had 16 million to spend would we blow the whole budget on Jones? I very much doubt it, in fact the would be a serious uproar if we did. The question is, will any club be willing to pay so much for his potential, His clause valuation and other clubs valuations are reported to be miles apart. Football is all about opinions and I do not think he is worth anywhere near 16 million at present, there is far too many if's and buts, I also noticed when he played for the under 21's the other day that he was putting weight on and looked quite out of shape, Less composed on the ball than his defensive partner Smalling, who incidentally was the defender who stood out with his range of passing and his speed. if we can get that figure, which is a big IF, then its great business IMO, There has been too many so called the next big thing players appear on the scene and quickly disappear in years gone by for us all to get to disheartend by his potential exit. Remember Jeffers, Pennant, Delph, Agbonlahour, Bentley, Bendtnar, Macheda, Kightley, Martin Taylor,Cadamaateri, Vaughn, Michael Johnson, Ireland the list goes on of so called wonder boys who have either gone of the boil or just gone of the Map
glen9mullan
16mil not enough, but as a starting point for negotiations it makes sense. unfortunately, it seems to be a figure potential clubs are building up to, rather than starting from
retroflair31
I don't want Jones to leave but 16 million (as the lowest we would now be forced to accept) is a good amount for someone so young. I know that he has so much ability and potential, however, this potential needs to be fulfilled. I'm sure it will but if he was to leave this summer and we sold for 16 million it's not as bad as it could be really is it?? As it is I still feel that Jones will spend at least one more season with us.
Walker
What are guys talking about ? 16m is a good money for Jones. Remember, he was injured for most of the season and signed a deal in Jan2010. Its obvious that agent negotiated the release clause. 16m for a 20 year old who didn't play most of the season is good. This is a player's market. There might be a bidding war if there was no release clause. But at same time, some big clubs could have poached him for even 10 or 12m as well. Clause guarentees 16m, which in other case is not possible.
sydqcb5
The bottom line for me is that we have a local lad who has come through the ranks and is potentially (and yes of course right now ONLY potentially) one of the greatest Rovers of recent times, and I don't want to see him leave because he's can't be replaced. Not because of his ability, but because of what he means to the place. 16m is a lot of money, but it can't buy us players coming through the system.
rossp2112
It can though rossp2112 can't it?? If we put a large chunk of this into the development program why shouldn't others (local ideally) follow suit?
Walker
16.5 million is a lot for a 20 year old with very brief experience of the Premiership. Also, now sounds like you might be getting a lot more for him with the scousers moving with a 22 million bid - if you believe the papers. He is a good player and assuming he stays clear of injuries will thrive under the right manager - Dalgleish or The Dark Lord possibly. You have to accept he won't be staying but the question is how much can you recoup for a youth player who cost you nothing.
CITYBOY1000
well this article means nufin now:p the release clause didnt make a difference we got his worth 20.5 + 4 is a deal i would take anyday of the week
aadil4rovers
how can we be so stupid...venky is useless.
DommyWalker
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Blackburn Rovers Articles

A More Than Deserved Point (Monday October 20 2014)

Stats: Ipswich Town v Blackburn Rovers (Saturday October 18 2014)

Rovers Preview: Ipswich Town (a) (Friday October 17 2014)

Improvement But Still Doubts (Friday October 17 2014)

King Added To The List!! (Wednesday October 15 2014)

Injuries on Duty! (Tuesday October 14 2014)

Kean Returns To Ewood (Monday October 13 2014)

Hanley Sidelined (Monday October 13 2014)

King Has His Say Again (Monday October 13 2014)

Archived Blackburn Rovers Articles

List All Vital Blackburn Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

League Results (view all)

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
10. Brentford 12 5 3 4 -1 18
11. Sheff Wed 12 4 5 3 0 17
12. Cardiff 12 4 4 4 0 16
13. Blackburn 12 4 4 4 -2 16
14. Leeds Utd 12 4 3 5 -3 15
15. Rotherham 12 4 3 5 -3 15
16. Reading 12 4 3 5 -5 15

Breaking League News

Baby Fletch: Pleased with going top
Bournemouth : 21/10/2014 08:04:00
LUFC On This Day - October 21st
Leeds Utd : 21/10/2014 07:22:00
Injury Update
Norwich : 21/10/2014 07:00:00
Man of the Match: Demarai Gray
Birmingham : 21/10/2014 07:00:00
Cardiff v Forest: Match Report From Kid's Corner!
Forest : 21/10/2014 00:03:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Blackburn Rovers Man of the Match v IpswichTown?
Suggested By:  Walker
Steele 0%
Marshall 50%
Duffy 25%
Kilgallon (Sent Off) 0%
Olsson 0%
Cairney (off 83) 0%
Evans 0%
Williamson 0%
Conway (off 68) 0%
Rhodes (off 75) 0%
Gestede 25%
Substitute: Baptiste (on 68) 0%
Substitute: Henley (on 75) 0%
Substitute: (Tunnicliffe on 83) 0%