Blackburn Rovers - Dickov Joins City
UK time is: 06:21:42
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Dickov Joins City

Paul Dickov has been released by Blackburn after he rejected an offer of a new contract at Ewood Park.

Rovers' chairman John Williams told the Lancashire Evening Post: 'Paul has been released after he decided not to accept our offer of a new contract.

'I don't think there was any problem with the terms we offered him, it was more of a football decision.'

Dickov scored seven goals last season for Mark Hughes' side after joining for £150,000 from Leicester in June 2004.




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!


Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer:  Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Monday May 29 2006

Time: 5:14PM

Your Comments (oldest first)

Change to most recent first
man city?
green giant 12
Report Abuse
29/05/2006 21:01:00

Good riddance to bad rubbish.
BigYid
Report Abuse
31/05/2006 12:19:00

As a player and a person iv'e always hated Dickov, every 5minutes he's moaning or kicking, just like we sung to him down at Fratton Park F**K OFF DICKOV......... DICKOV F**K OFF
Linvoy#1
Report Abuse
02/06/2006 10:10:00

one last hurrah for one of the most hated players in the prem! Loved it when John Terry had him by the scruff of the neck!
merlin
Report Abuse
02/06/2006 19:38:00

hes just a dirty little bugger! welcomed throughout the world but especially spain
vertigo_red
Report Abuse
03/06/2006 13:05:00

He is a dirty player and he was a complete ******* at fratton park but I wouldn't mind having him on my side for a change. He does get stuck in. Still a prick tho
POMPEYMEV
Report Abuse
07/06/2006 14:50:00

suited rovers down to the ground then :p. Hes nothing special, won't be missed. Hughes has already shown he is good in the market, so a better placement will likely be found easily enough.
moko84
Report Abuse
14/06/2006 10:18:00

He's a tósser of the highest order. Does nothing but moan and squinny. I wouldn't have him in my team in a million years. I'm echoing Linvoy here.
FEn_100
Report Abuse
15/06/2006 09:25:00

Not a bad player - but i agree with you Fen..moans too much for my liking!
richy23
Report Abuse
18/06/2006 10:57:00

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Blackburn Rovers Articles

Rovers Finish With Wigan Win (Monday August 3 2015)

Blackburn Exit Confirmed (Friday July 31 2015)

Villa Bag The Special(s) Rudy (Friday July 31 2015)

No Deal!! Rovers Refused Kim Permit (Thursday July 30 2015)

Gestede Going & Dunn Joins Oldham (Thursday July 30 2015)

Kim Bo-Kyung A No Go? (Thursday July 30 2015)

Two Fixture Changes (Thursday July 30 2015)

Praise For Blackburn Trialist (Thursday July 30 2015)

Archived Blackburn Rovers Articles

List All Vital Blackburn Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

Vital Members League (view all)

1. Walker 10
2. dallydally 8
3. rovers2011 1
4. pomster 1

League Results (view all)

Latest Results

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
1. Birmingham 0 0 0 0 +0 0
2. Blackburn 0 0 0 0 +0 0
3. Bolton 0 0 0 0 +0 0
4. Brentford 0 0 0 0 +0 0
5. Brighton 0 0 0 0 +0 0
6. Bristol City 0 0 0 0 +0 0
7. Burnley 0 0 0 0 +0 0

Blackburn Rovers Fixtures (view all)

Breaking League News

Former Owls Midfielders Sign Deals in Football League
» Sheff Wed : 03/08/2015 21:25:01
Carvalhal Comments on Joao's Potential and Credentials
» Sheff Wed : 03/08/2015 21:03:01
Ticket Details Released for Boro Clash at S6
» Sheff Wed : 03/08/2015 20:20:00
No Serious Ulvestad Damage
» Burnley : 03/08/2015 20:19:01
Duff - I Enjoyed It
» Burnley : 03/08/2015 20:06:01

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

£10m for Rhodes....Fair price?
Suggested By:  VitalRovers
Yes! Easily worth £10m 12%
No....It's not enough! 65%
Too much 19%
Whatever we'll not get that 4%