UK time is: 19:29:55
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Its A Disgrace!!!!

Its half time in our beloved Rovers battle with Chelsea. Were 1-0 down courtesy of an own goal, but that is not what has me frustrated. What has me angry, yet again, is the commentary.

The match begins, were without our best player in Dunn- and there is no mention of his influence on the team. The commentators briefly say our only chance is scoring from set peices, yet fail to mention the impact the loss of Chris Samba will have in this area. They then justify this claim by saying 'Nelsen and Olssen are good in the air' or something stupid like that.

Do they even know who Blackburn are? Have they watched a Rovers game this year? Nelsen is a club legend, but has only scored one goal, and as for Olssen....

The first half was then dominated by talk of Chelsea, who is missing and why, Ballack to Drogba to Anelka... If my eyes were closed i would think Chelsea were playing themselves. Add to that, Robinson is making brilliant saves- and there is no mention of his recent form, England prospects etc. Why? because it is apparant that the pair of esteemed commentators have not bothered to watch a Rovers game, or at the very least, talk with a Rovers fan for more than 3-5 seconds.

If I am watching the cricket, I get balanced commentary that gives me an insight into teams. I learn a little bit of history. I learn tactics, club issues and get a balanced view of who is playing; all this is usually provided by commentators.

Now i can not speak for everyone, but i am a lover of sport- and in no other sport have i experienced such biased and clearly uninformed commentary. It makes the whole viewing experience less enjoyable and trivialises our club. As a viewer, I learn nothing. As a supporter, I feel frustrated. And as a lover of sport, I feel I am being sold short by the Premier League.

Its time to change this ridiculous trend. Lets get informed people with informed opinions, not the same crap week in week out.

Well said my Aussie Compatriot.




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Retroflair31 Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Sunday October 25 2009

Time: 12:38AM

Your Comments

I'm confused. Your angry that they don't mention Samba and Dunn missing, but are also angry when they say Nelsen and Olsson are good in the air?! lol. Does anything making you happy?! Only joshing mate! I too watched the match, and the commentary was almost as dire as the result!
Tombo1984
dw bout him tombo...retro never makes ny sense :D
sasman
Oh come on, Robinson was refered to as EX England GK and JT's teammate. When a team plays as well as we did yesterday, the commentators are bound to forget the other team. SOrry fellas. :-)
JT_daniel
but most of the comments that were made were in the first half when we werent snowed under. Some of the analysis of Rovers was terrible as Retro says - "Olsson good in the air??!" I have never seen him win a header EVER!!!!
Mikey D
Be fair - the way Rovers played (or more to the point - didn't play) gave any commentator every reason to be one sided - what could they say about Rovers? I was watching ESPN and the commentary seemed reasonable - at the end it was embarrassing watching them try and find something good to say about Rovers. Hope Rovers actually turn up against Utd - otherwise it's going to be another ordeal that I don't want televised on ESPN)
YORK ROVER
we r looking for an excuse to find............................................... if we had won we would not give a flying fu.ck on what the commentator said
aadil4rovers
TBF it was a point raised earlier in the season during the match with Wolves as well. The commentators dont even bother to do their research on the so called "small" clubs. They just come out with cliched rubbish that is outdated... it might seem bitter after a defeat but it is still a very valid point.
Mikey Delap
lol Sasman... yeah Tombo1984 that is exactly my point- Nelsen and Olsson are quite clearly not good in the air! commentators simply have got no clue... oh well at the end of the day it was very poor effort, but remember this was written at half time when we were only 1 down after an OG...
retroflair31
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Blackburn Rovers Articles

Bowyer: Best Win Of The Season (Monday November 24 2014)

Robbo Told To Fight (Monday November 24 2014)

Stats: Blackburn Rovers v Leeds United (Saturday November 22 2014)

Rovers Preview: Leeds United (Saturday November 22 2014)

Rovers Linked With Lawrence?? (Tuesday November 18 2014)

Robbo Wants Out (Sunday November 16 2014)

Final Weekend Details Revealed (Sunday November 16 2014)

Break Comes At The Right Time (Thursday November 13 2014)

Fulham Ponder Tunnicliffe Recall?? (Wednesday November 12 2014)

Football Aid 2015 - Play at Ewood Park! (Monday November 10 2014)

Archived Blackburn Rovers Articles

List All Vital Blackburn Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

League Results (view all)

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
3. Middlesbrough 18 9 5 4 14 32
4. Ipswich 18 8 7 3 8 31
5. Brentford 18 9 4 5 2 31
6. Blackburn 18 8 6 4 4 30
7. Watford 18 8 5 5 10 29
8. Forest 18 7 7 4 6 28
9. Charlton 18 6 10 2 2 28

Breaking League News

Duo Head Out On Loan
Millwall : 27/11/2014 19:21:00
Duo Leave On Loan
Brighton : 27/11/2014 19:15:00
Team news: Norwich vs Reading
Reading : 27/11/2014 18:27:00
Meet the ref: Rotherham v Blackpool
Blackpool : 27/11/2014 18:26:00
Join up to Blackpool Vital
Blackpool : 27/11/2014 18:12:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Blackburn Rovers Man of the Match against Leeds United?
Suggested By:  Walker
Steele 23%
Baptiste 0%
Hanley 0%
Duffy 0%
Olsson 0%
Cairney 0%
Evans (Off 89) 22%
Williamson (Off 65) 0%
Marshall 0%
Rhodes 44%
Gestede (Off 74) 0%
Substitute: Tunnicliffe (65) 0%
Substitute: Varney (74) 0%
Substitute: Taylor (89) 11%