Blackburn Rovers - Progressive Play Un-Rewarded
UK time is: 08:45:18
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Progressive Play Un-Rewarded

Hughes has told the official site that he was proud of the way Rovers battled in the 4-2 loss to Chelsea at Stamford Bridge. Following a poor start, our troops rallied to go in at half time on level terms. Hughes said:

'I thought we were excellent in the first half, we gave ourselves a mountain to climb by going two goals down. I thought the penalty was a harsh decision and we didn't really defend the first goal, they caught us cold and we found ourselves two goals down very quickly. You wonder what kind of day you are going to have in the office , but fair play to us I thought we were excellent in the first half, we dominated play and caused them problems and got right back into the game.'

On the second half Hughes added:

'Second half it was very much more of the same, I felt we were very much in the game, and we had a real determination to pull off a shock, but the difference today was their delivery into the box, with the quality of players they have they got great delivery and really that was the only way I could see us conceding. The delivery for the third goal was excellent, very hard to deal with, then we went to try to get back on level terms and they got a lucky deflection for the fourth.'

He also thinks Rovers style was good but un-rewarded:

'Our play was very progressive, but went without reward. Overall I was pleased, we caused them some problems especially in the first half. We are on a good run, and we made a very good team look ordinary at times. Certainly our first half performance merited some reward but it wasn't to be, we showed a lot of character to try to get back into the game.'

Next up is Charlton at home, we need to show the same character and pick up all three points, get us moving in the right direction up the league.

**Have you got what it takes to run this site? Or do you run an existing site and want to move over to the exciting Vital Network? If so, press on the advert and get Vitalled!**




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!

The Journalist

Writer: Site Staff Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Monday October 31 2005

Time: 10:12AM

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Blackburn Rovers Articles

New Deal For Midfielder (Thursday July 2 2015)

Morris Signs For Bradford City (Thursday July 2 2015)

New Rovers Deal For Lenihan (Thursday July 2 2015)

Nyambe Signs Rovers Contract (Thursday July 2 2015)

Rovers Verses Bolton On Sky Sports (Thursday July 2 2015)

Davies A Rovers Option?? (Tuesday June 30 2015)

Three Rovers Changes (Tuesday June 30 2015)

Morris Leaving Ewood Park (Tuesday June 30 2015)

Rovers Linked With Maynard (Tuesday June 30 2015)

Archived Blackburn Rovers Articles

List All Vital Blackburn Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

Vital Members League (view all)

1. dallydally 6
2. Walker 5

League Results (view all)

Latest Results

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
1. Birmingham 0 0 0 0 +0 0
2. Blackburn 0 0 0 0 +0 0
3. Bolton 0 0 0 0 +0 0
4. Brentford 0 0 0 0 +0 0
5. Brighton 0 0 0 0 +0 0
6. Bristol City 0 0 0 0 +0 0
7. Burnley 0 0 0 0 +0 0

Blackburn Rovers Fixtures (view all)

Breaking League News

LUFC Leeds chasing experienced Premier League midfielder
Leeds Utd : 05/07/2015 08:11:01
LUFC On This Day - July 5th
Leeds Utd : 05/07/2015 07:48:00
Ince Out, So Whittingham In?
Hull City : 04/07/2015 15:47:01
Ince Delighted With Derby Return
Derby County : 04/07/2015 15:39:01
Revell - We'll Certainly Be Fit
Cardiff : 04/07/2015 15:24:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

10m for Rhodes....Fair price?
Suggested By:  VitalRovers
Yes! Easily worth 10m 18%
No....It's not enough! 68%
Too much 11%
Whatever we'll not get that 2%